Primo-Europe

Découvert sur drzz

Merci de relayer sur vos Blogs. Vous pouvez copier/coller article et photos et les mettre sur vos différents sites ou envoyer à toutes vos connaissances par e-mail. Merci !

Publié par spqr le 29 Août 2008

AL-MAJARIDAH – Two illegal Yemeni immigrants, disguised as women, were arrested at a checkpoint near Asir. Lt. Col. Abdullah Bin Ayidh Al-Qarni, spokesperson for the Asir Region Police said the vehicle was stopped at an Al-Majaridah checkpoint with the two ‘women’ as well their driver. The third unidentified man said the two women in his car were his wife and sister. Police discovered that the ‘women’ were in fact men and arrested the three.

Tsk tsk mænd nu om stunder...de stjæler da også enhver kvinde-outfit hvadenten det er klaprende sko, slangeskind jakker, pelse, perlehalskæder og nu går turen altså til burkaér. Feminiseringen af mænd sniger sig nu ind på det muslimske-marked. LOL!

Tak til "Just A Nobody" for tippet.

Varför får man på Lugnets innomhusbad bada fullt påklädd ink. Burka med trosor och allt men om en kille  badar med kalsong under badbrallorna så blir han utkastad?

Är detta vad som kallas ett jämställt och rättvist samhälle?

Viele konservative oder traditionell verbundene oder
aus traditionellen Familien stammende muslimische
Frauen tragen ein Kopftuch nicht nur beim Moscheebesuch
sondern auch im Alltag, einen so genannten Tschador
(persisch) oder Hidschab bzw. Hijab (arabisch),
als Teil der Glaubenspraxis.

Es werden zusätzlich Berichte über das Leben
des Propheten Mohammed hinzugezogen.Die Mehrheit
der Korangelehrten bezieht sich auch auf Ibn Abbas,
einen Wegbegleiter Mohammeds, der gesagt haben soll,
dass „was normalerweise sichtbar ist“ sich auf
„Gesicht und Hände“ bezieht, diese daher nicht bedeckt
werden müssen. Eine kleinere Anzahl von Muslimen lehrt
jedoch, dass die Frauen sich komplett verhüllen müssen,
was eben auch das Gesicht und die Hände mit einschließt.

Fazit: Verschleierung ist eine stake Abgrenzung
zur Öffentlichkeit und Verweigerung der Integration.
In einem Muslimischen Land ist das Tragen von Kurzen
Blusen oder Miniröcken untersagt!

Zu diesem Artikel gibt es ein ausführliches PowerPoint.
Falls Du Interesse hast, an solchen oder endlichen  Themen,
melde Dich auf unserer Homepage.

Everytime I see that many Chinese working in unison, I have to imagine that somewhere out there Phillip Knight is smiling.

(Seriously over the course of the seven hour event I must have made about 64 slave labor jokes.)

I think the entire fireworks display was just a 100 million dollar built in excuse for the pollution.

"Hey, I can't see the great wall from here. Don't worry it was just the fireworks."

There were a whole lot of female swimmers from Muslim countries. And this isn't a joke. But how does that work? Does Speedo make a burka?

Quando arriva l'estate ci sono dei misteri nell'abbigliamento maschile e femminile che non riesco a comprendere.

Per gli uomini: i calzoni a pinocchietto.

Questi calzoni, veramente molto in voga da qualche estate, si ripresentano ora con una nuova lunghezza ancora più insensata delle precedenti. Facendo un piccolo passo indietro: il bermuda maschile fino a 20 anni fa era un calzoncino corto, spesso osceno addosso ad anziani pensionati con pancia a grembiule e coscia floscia in bella mostra. Poi arrivarono i bermudoni al ginocchio (o appena sotto) di provenienza USA che, devo dire, mantengono generalmente il loro aplomb. Gli ultimi anni hanno visto apparire, prima timidamente poi come un fiume in piena, i pinocchietti sui polpacci pelosi degli uomini. Dunque pantaloni all'apparenza normalissimi per vestibilità e taglio, spesso sportivi, che però si fermano inspiegabilmente a metà polpaccio come un cavalcavia incompiuto sulla Salerno-Reggio Calabria e che mi generano la stessa ansia e onta. Se poi il pinocchietto viene abbinato a infradito e/o crocs e a borsello a tracolla ecco che l'ansia si trasforma in orticaria. Ok, di questo si è scritto e detto tanto nella blogosfera. La novità di quest'anno è il pinocchietto allungato, ovvero quel calzone che scende finalmente sul polpaccio ma si ferma appena sopra la caviglia. Questo tipo di calzone sembra essere il prediletto da ultrasessantenni che vogliono vestire "giovane" e da militari in libera uscita che vogliono essere trendy. Il pinocchietto allungato non si spiega. E' un rebus irrisolvibile. Che forse areare la caviglia renda più sopportabile il caldo? Che sia un vezzo maschile? Che qualche furbo imprenditore abbia trovato il modo di risparmiare sulla stoffa spacciandoli per divertenti? E chi glielo spiega a quel signore che ho visto per strada col pinocchietto allungato e calzino bianco alla caviglia, che il suo centrimetro scoperto di pelle e peli non era poi così sexy?

Per le donne: la maglia allacciata sui fianchi.

In Italia la maglia allacciata sui fianchi è un sempreverde. Possono esserci 50 gradi all'ombra ma troverete sempre una ragazza con la sua brava maglietta a maniche lunghe annodata sui fianchi. Sembra stare lì casualmente, senza una vera ragione se non quella della praticità di non dover infilare la maglia nella borsa o su un braccio. Possibile però che la ragazza in questione abbia pensato di portarla con sé anche se fa così caldo? Sarà che poi entrerà in un ufficio con l'aria condizionata a manetta? Non lasciatevi ingannare: Il vero perché di questo abbigliamento è un segreto di pulcinella che le donne sanno o possono intuire. Le maglie sui fianchi non sono altro che la coperta di linus di tutte quelle donne che pensano di avere un culo grosso. Di solito bellissime silfidi che non hanno niente di sbagliato nel loro didietro ma che sono convinte del contrario. Se poi i loro glutei fossero veramente un po' abbondanti la maglia non farebbe che metterli in evidenza. Eppure ecco le tristi maglie che, persa la loro funzione originale, si fanno uniformi quotidiane, vezzo fashion (?!) e svolazzano numerose sui jeans come gonnelline masai o, meglio, come burka per fondoschiena. Flap, flap, flap.

Back in 2006, Jack Straw, a high-ranking member of the British government, let us all know that he thinks Muslim women who wear the full face veil should remove it for the 'betterment of society'. 

(Thank God for this astouding observation for as we all know the condition of society rests solely on the Muslim woman and her face veil!)

 Apparantly Straw has written in an article that he began to ruminate about 'one year ago' on the question of the veil and whether it damaged relations of people from different religions and ethnic backgrounds.

Such deep and profound thinking calls out for a response.  Of course, it is a Muslim woman with her face covered who is impacting society negatively.  No. No.  It's not the criminal element or the politicians themselves who divide society with their lies and abuse of power.

That's very clever.  Blame the Muslim woman who is veiling her face for the ills of society.  What Straw overlooks entirely is that the Muslim woman in the burka can more often than not be thanked by society for enriching it and making it a better place. 

More often than not, she stays home and raises her children-teaching them about the very morals and ethics you claim to espouse.  The grand lie in all of this is that no one is really concerned with the moral fabric of society and all of us just getting along.  If that were the case, we would be investing more in our own children as they represent the future of our societies.

This is a lame attempt to take the Islam out of these women and the Islamic socities they so love and happily thrive in. 

Hanifah

By the way, the real way to peace and equality is for us all to accept that in this global society we live in there is a great diversity in beliefs and cultures.  We must strive to allow our neighbors to be who they are without attempting to bully others into conforming to our version of the ideal.

Jaja, det är väl ingen stor förlust men jag blev på dåligt humör. Här har vi ytterligare en gammal gubbe som kåtar upp sig på mig och dessutom en kurd till som skämmer ut sina bröder genom att tro att svennebrudar är lättfotade.

Blä.

But what I want to talk about is THE Madonna/Whore -- Madonna herself, or rather the criticism I heard of her recently. One female news reader (MSNBC, probably) had the audacity to say that Madonna was due criticism because A-Rod's wife was filing for divorce after he'd been spending a lot of time with Madonna. Poor A-Rod, whoever the hell he is anyway -- some baseball legend in his own mind, I gather?? Poor soul can't keep his wedding vows and it's all Madonna-Whore's fault.

(Edited to add: The current Us magazine front page also features a criticism of Madonna for ruining A-Rod's marriage. )

WHOA, there. Just farkin' whoa, people. Women especially need to listen up.

Let's get something straight: We women are NOT responsible for helping men keep their wedding vows. Nope. That's another of Patriarchy's little tricks and dead-end traps for women: trying to make US responsible for their morality (or lack thereof) or for civilizing them and making them behave after they've reached majority, letting them off the hook by putting us on the hook.

Nosireee, that don't cut it. Men and men alone are responsible for their respective faithfulness, or lack thereof, or any other of their boorish, anti-social and/or misogynist behaviors.

Trying to make US responsible for your wedding vows simply pits us against our sisters and keeps us separated, displaces the responsibility letting men off the friggin' hook -- again and again and again. For years we fell for this (and some still do)! Well, no more.

And on this matter, I know whereof I speak. My first marriage ended because he was unfaithful to me. Through it all, I never was the least bit upset with the Other Woman. I didn't like it much, being betrayed like that, but I never held her responsible in any way. SHE wasn't the one who betrayed me and my affections. SHE didn't take any wedding vows that involved me. SHE had no relationship with me, or obligation to me. Did she go after him, tempt him? Doesn't matter one whit whether she did or didn't: it was HIS responsibility to say no, find some way to avoid temptation, or, alternatively, suffer the consequences, which he did. We both did.

(Aside: I did enjoy some small early satisfaction when the Other Woman turned him down flat: he was a mere trifle to her.)

And while I'm at it, that's what's wrong with burkas, too: they make men's morality and self-control women's business, to such an extent that the woman can't live full lives because their men are so hopelessly weak and unable to control themselves that the women's lives must be curtailed and crimped and limited. Doesn't speak very well for the men, does it?

Please note: Even though I am not myself a "religious" person, I usually try to respect the fact that other people are, and treat their religious beliefs somewhat respectfully. But I draw the line with misogynist religious beliefs, or any beliefs that seriously demean women and hinder their ability to live full lives. And frankly patriarchal religions are full of misogyny. Burkas definitely fit my no-respect category, as do birth control and abortion.

This of course is not the first time that a Muslim woman has been assaulted in this way.  Despite the fact that many will acknowledge that they are vulnerable bodies in our society, it has been deemed appropriate to physically attack them for wearing the burka or the abbya in public.  Whether or not we agree with their "choices," (note it is not always a choice) as women we need to learn to support them.  We need to learn to respect cultural, and religious differences without imposing western ideals.

One of the things that bothers me about this, is the idea that Muslim women are particularly oppressed by the abbya without critiquing the so-called freedom of western women  Yes we are free to dress as we chose, but how often are those choices made without internalizing the male gaze? Why is it that we freely choose to wear things like high heels despite the fact that they are so harmful? We make these choices because we are not liberated.  Daily western women subject themselves to various tortures, and yet when we see a woman dressed in a burka we conclude that she is uniquely oppressed.  During the Iranian revolution women donned the burka as a sign of social protest, it was a rejection of all things western. Simply because something originates in the west does not necessarily make it liberating, or woman positive, just as something that is culturally different does not mean that it is necessarily anti woman.

The idea that women dressed in the burka are always oppressed is nothing less than western  cultural imperialism.  It is the reinforcement of a dichotomy, west equals good and east equals backward.  The project of saving Muslim women detracts us from the fact that oppression is a global phenomenon.  Just as women face injustice in Egypt, or Palestine, women daily negotiate degradation in western countries.  If we truly want to be a role in the emancipation of women we need to stop feeling that we have the right to intervene when we have not been asked.  Yes the subaltern can speak, and we should be listening.

All the same, I'm so excited I can't wait for tomorrow to continue work on it.

*

I've been introspective lately, been ruminating on a lot of things. For instance, I heard about a Muslim woman who was denied citizenship in France because she wears a burqa. She was accused of practicing her religion in a way that poses a threat to the country. The woman, who is married to a French citizen hails from Morocco and claims she is only following her husbands wishes.

There are some Muslims who feel the refusal was unjustified and contrary to the values epitomized in the country's constitution. One that guarantees an individuals basic rights and permits the freedom of worship. I can't argue with that.

However, IMO, I feel if staying with her husband and children in that country was more important to her, she ought to have removed her burqa for the purpose of application as a mark of respect to the values of the country she is applying to. Her wearing a burqa while applying for citizenship in a France is like me wearing a bikini to such an office in Saudi Arabia. Asking either party to look the other way is an assault on their sensibilities.

One can argue that SA does not espouse the same liberal values as France, or that compromising on her values is a sign of hypocracy, but then again the burqa itself is not a mandatory religious garb. No where in the Qur'an does it say all Muslim women should cover their faces. It is a cultural outfit worn by people of Arab descent. And frankly with the preponderance of Islamophobia, it has no place in a western country. There are millions of Muslims in countries like Indonesia, Nigeria, Malaysia, Turkey, etc, who do not wear it. In fact those who do so in these countries are sometimes regarded as aping an Arab way of life in a non-Arab society.

Where I come from the only sort of women that wear burqa are wives of Imams and scholars. It is not common, and nobody will be considered less Islamic for not doning it. A woman can still stay true to her religious values by wearing a khimar or a hijab that covers her bosom together with loose fitting outfits.

Personally I don't see someone that covers from head to toe being able to contribute to societal upliftment without her garb being a hindrance, unless she limits herself to a specific niche.

I think it's high time Muslims realize that their way of life will always be at odds with the Western way. And if you want to go and live in their country, despite that, be reasonable about it! Respect their sensitivities just as you would expect them to respect yours should they want to come and live in yours.

sondern um Exemplare von Debilia muslima wie wir auf dem obigen Bild sehen.

Die französische Rechtsprechung hat sich nun dafür entschieden, diesem Mummenschanz ein Ende zu machen, indem sie klar und unmißverständlich deutlich gemacht hat, dass derartige Geschöpfe nicht Französinnen werden können, demnach auch kein Heimatrecht im Lande Karl Martells haben.

Mehr bei WON

Ob man das, was die gute alte WELT dort abbildet, wirklich Burka nennt, denn das tragen die Frauen Aghanistans oder Neqab, was richtig wäre, denn das ist der saudische Schleier, spielt im Grunde keine Rolle. Die Mohammedaner in ihrern Foren, werden allerdings darauf herumreiten, nach dem Motto: "die wissen  noch nicht einmal, wie der Fetzen richtig heißt, aber sich das Maul darüber zerreissen, das können die blöden Kuffar-Journalisten.' Das Ganze Theater natürlich nur , um von der Tatsache abzulenken, dass hier bei uns im Westen eine deratige Vermummung nicht mit der Menschenwürde und der Gleichberechtigung vereinbar ist. und eben nicht von der Glaubensfreiheit gedeckt ist.

Damit floss zum ersten Mal die tatsächlich gelebte, religiöse Praxis in die Beurteilung der Integrationsfähigkeit ein.

Die marokkanische Muslimin Faiza M. war 2000 nach Frankreich eingewandert - einen Stoffkäfig trug sie in Marokko nie. Erst als sie einen französischen Moslem heiratete, legte sie ihn an.

So die Zusammenfassung des Artikels von Stéphanie Le Bars in "le monde".
Die Burka tragende Marokkanerin wird sich mit dem Urteil des Französischen Verfassungsgerichtshofs kaum abfinden und ihren Fall dem Europäischen Menschenrechtshof vortragen. Mit an Sicherheit grenzender Wahrscheinlichkeit wird dieser das Urteil des Verfassungsgerichts aufheben und Frankreich dazu verknurren, die Burka einzubürgern.

Mænd og kvinder er lige i Islam og indeholder de samme menneskelige drifter. Endda siger Gud i Koranen også til kvinderne ligeså vel til mændene, at de skal sænke deres blikke af ærbarhed. Så er det vel ikke svært, at regne ud at kvinder og mænd er lige "gode" om at komme til at bryde Guds anbefalinger.

"And say to the faithful women to lower their gazes, and to guard their private parts, and not to display their adornment except what is apparent of it, and to extend their headcoverings (khimars) to cover their bosoms (jaybs)," Surah Nur 31

"Tell the faithful men to lower their gaze and be modest. That is purer for them. Lo! Allah is aware of what they do." Surah Nur 30

Prophet (saws) “And the eyes commit zina (adultery). Their zina is gazing.”

The Prophet (saws) commanded Ali (as) said: “Ali! Do not look once after another, for the first look is for you (since it happens accidentally) while the second is against you.”

Nedenstående reklame for slør fastholder den kulturelle element i slørets symbolik om, at man tager sløret på pga. mændenes blikke! Jeg kan slet ikke forholde mig rationelt til denne tankegang. Der står oversat på dansk: "Du kan ikke stoppe dem, men du kan beskytte dig selv".

Set på http://muslimahmediawatch.blogspot.com/

Now, Amidinnerjacket.

h/t drained brain at LGF LinkViewer

In Mississauga, Canada, Muhammad Parvez, 57, has been officially charged with first-degree murder in last December's pre-meditated strangling death of his 16-year-old daughter, Aqsa.

And why did she die at the hands of her father?

Because of a fucking scarf.

Ms. Parvez chose to shed her Muslim headscarf or hijab, and this act of defiance against religious oppression cost this beautiful girl her life.

Yet another atrocity committed by a man against a woman to appease an imaginary god.

It just makes me sick.

To see my original post about this, click here .

[source: The Toronto Star]

What I find particularly disappointing is that women always seem to get the short end of the stick when it comes to religion (after all, the guy in the sky is male, so why should we be surprised) followed by hollow justifications such as purity etc. While it actually just boils down to male jealousy or some males inability to behave like gentlemen....

If that god (in this case Allah) wanted woman to look like amateur ninjas he would have created them so ugly that you want them to cover up and not have wasted his time making them attractive to the male of the species. Not that he did, it is a simple evolutionary process to ensure mating and survival of the species, but lets pretend for an awfully long second that there is a male chauvinist pig in the sky with an unhealthy interest in our sex lives.

So here we have the following situation:

The United States consulate in Johannesburg recently hosted the burkas Project, dealing with Muslim identity from the perspective of Muslim women who wear the burka (an outer garment worn by women in some Islamic traditions for the purpose of cloaking the entire body) and niqab (a veil that covers the face).

Of course it was done as a PR stunt by the US consulate, trying to appease the adherents of Islam in a small token way, in the vain hope that their stuff-up in Middle East will somehow be easier to swallow.

Youngsters are a soft target, and they know it (politicians don't hug babies because they love them, but because their parents do) ..... one wonders what the response would have been if they decided to pull this PR stunt with adult women..

O well lets look at some of the responses:

People would laugh at us as if the religion was a joke. I felt as if I was a ghost at times and like I was mourning. It was tiring and hot. I used bright colours to show that I was not mourning, but happy. The circles represent the fact that there is no end to people's ignorance -- they knew nothing about us, but chose to laugh.

And you are surprised that they laughed, as they say in the classics, when in Rome do as the Romans do. ... circles representing ignorance? Errmm it was her choice to disappear from sight behind a cloth, and she knew the consequences, it was her choice and not as if she was born with this outfit. I think the circles represented her own ignorance about human behavior.

didn't know my true identity because of people's negativity. I felt as though I was doing something wrong because of people's stares. First, I felt dehumanised, then I felt pure and innocent -- that's why I put a white ribbon on my burka. I realised that people's minds have not changed, so the pins symbolise the cruelty. This experience has taught me to respect religion far more than I ever have.

Lets make this simple. You covered yourself up like a mummy with certain symbolism attached to it (not your own) in an environment where it is not the norm.... and it taught you to respect a delusion more? Eish.

The judgement that oozed from the customers' eyes pierced my heart, causing me to look quickly down in humility. I missed my inviting smile, daring red hair, my feminine soft hands and everything else God had blessed me with, but I knew that a piece of cloth didn't define me, nor did I have to look like everyone else to feel that little inch of acceptance, but I began to feel weary.

Errm yip, you decided to cover up your "god given" features.... your choice, not those who "judged" you.

Every child was scared of us and even asked if we were good or bad people.

Aaahh trust little children to express truthfully what adults are really thinking. Perfectly normal.

Many women are reclaiming the burka, reinterpreting it in light of its original purpose, giving back to women ultimate control of their own bodies. You see, I am not controlled by my miniskirt and revealing shirt, so I'm never harassed like sexual dirt!

O bingo. Sexual dirt??? Excuse me... and what is the male role in all of this??? I mean what does it take for a woman to be considered sexual dirt?? A warped religous conviction maybe?

No it does not give you back ultimate control, you abdicate that control to a piece of cloth.... and a miniskirt etc does not control you either.... you get the drift.

The meaning of this way of dress extends to the depths of modesty, privacy and morality. Being feminine represents purity. Being pure comes with morals and dignity, which are linked to respect and faith and, ultimately, when this puzzle is built, a picture of contentment, serenity and peace is established. Why do they consider it derogatory when they have no knowledge of Islam?

And they leave the most deluded thinking for last.... this piece of cloth acts as a symbol for modesty, privacy, morality... hmmmm and the male version for this is?

So they want to promote knowledge of Islam by parading girls around in mobile prisons (mind prisons as well)?

Technorati Tags: Islam, Religion, Delusion, Burka

PI News Blog

artwork