<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>tagcow &amp;laquo; WordPress.com Tag Feed</title>
	<link>http://wordpress.com/tag/tagcow/</link>
	<description>Feed of posts on WordPress.com tagged "tagcow"</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 19:05:16 +0000</pubDate>

	<generator>http://wordpress.com/tags/</generator>
	<language>en</language>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Service tags digital photos for you]]></title>
<link>http://vimsite.wordpress.com/?p=252</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 12:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>vimsite</dc:creator>
<guid>http://vimsite.com/2008/08/03/service-tags-digital-photos-for-you/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Now that you&#8217;ve owned a digital camera for a while, chances are your collection of digital pho]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that you've owned a digital camera for a while, chances are your collection of digital photographs is growing to the point where they're becoming completely unmanageable. If you find yourself drowning in a sea of digital images and you just can't remember where you stored that picture of cousin Betty at the beach that you took on your vacation two years ago, you might want to consider the benefits of tagging.</p>
<p>A tag is nothing more than a keyword that describes the image to which it is attached. And the premise behind tagging is a simple one: The more tags you assign to an image, the better the chances are of finding it. It turns out that there are a number of standards out there that attempt to regulate many of the different characteristics associated to digital images.</p>
<p>Some of the standards apply to compression. For example, the JPEG standard allows for the reduction of digital information that represents the image we see. By eliminating a certain amount of redundancy that's inherent in a raw digital image, the physical size of that file will be substantially smaller.</p>
<p>Read more: <a href="http://www.sunherald.com/business/story/722583.html" rel="nofollow">Service tags digital photos for you</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Tagguez vos photos facilement]]></title>
<link>http://fpoisson.wordpress.com/?p=184</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 01:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Francis Poisson-Gagnon</dc:creator>
<guid>http://bocalapoisson.com/2008/04/02/tagguez-vos-photos-facilement/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Vous avez envie de tagguer vos photos afin de les publier sur internet mais vous n&#8217;avez pas le]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="justify">Vous avez envie de tagguer vos photos afin de les publier sur internet mais vous n'avez pas le temps. Le service <a href="http://www.tagcow.com" target="_blank">TagCow</a> s'occupe de ça pour vous, selon un procédé mystérieux supposément "automatique", vos photos sont taggués quelques heures plus tard. Je l'ai essayé et c'est assez surprenant... mais assez intriguant, voici un vidéo de démonstration comment cela se passe sur le site web de <a href="http://www.tagcow.com" target="_blank">TagCow</a>. C'est assez simple, vous verrez.</p>
<div style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.tagcow.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://fpoisson.wordpress.com/files/2008/04/logo.png" alt="logo.png" /></a></div>
<p align="justify">Ce mystère n'en serait pas un en fait, le blog anglophone de <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/262473499/" target="_blank">Techcrunch</a> a eu l'information que ce sont des personnes qui sont payés pour tagguer les photos selon un salaire de 4 cents par 5 photos. Pour quelqu'un de très productif, cela peut représenter un salaire de 1,20$ par heure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
